在科學與工程學上，物體的重量指的通常是重力作用在它身上的力。重量是向量，它的量（純量）一般用斜體 <math>W</math> 表示。重量是質量 <math>m</math> 和當地重力加速度 <math>g</math> 的乘積，即為：<math>W=mg</math>。重力的計量單位和力一樣，也就是國際單位制（SI）的「牛頓」。舉例而言，一件質量為一公斤的物體在地球表面重9.8牛頓，而在月球上則重9.8牛頓的六分之一。根據這個定義，若要一個物體沒有重量，原則上只有無限遠離所有其他具有質量的物體才可能發生。雖然科學上重量和質量是不同的量，日常生活中常會將兩者混用。例如轉換或比較以磅力為單位的力和以公斤為單位的質量，反之亦然。
量值等於<math>mg</math>牛頓的力也會寫為 kg-wt（m kilogram weight 的縮寫）。
- When the reference frame is Earth, this quantity comprises not only the local gravitational force, but also the local centrifugal force due to the rotation of the Earth, a force which varies with latitude.
- The effect of atmospheric buoyancy is excluded in the weight.
- In common parlance, the name "weight" continues to be used where "mass" is meant, but this practice is deprecated.
|ISO 80000-4 (2006)}}
The definition is dependent on the chosen frame of reference. When the chosen frame is co-moving with the object in question then this definition precisely agrees with the operational definition. If the specified frame is the surface of the Earth, the weight according to the ISO and gravitational definitions differ only by the centrifugal effects due to the rotation of the Earth.
In many real world situations the act of weighing may produce a result that differs from the ideal value provided by the definition used. This is usually referred to as the apparent weight of the object. A common example of this is the effect of buoyancy, when an object is immersed in a fluid the displacement of the fluid will cause an upward force on the object, making it appear lighter when weighed on a scale. The apparent weight may be similarly affected by levitation and mechanical suspension. When the gravitational definition of weight is used, the operational weight measured by an accelerating scale is often also referred to as the apparent weight.
In modern scientific usage, weight and mass are fundamentally different quantities: mass is an intrinsic property of matter, whereas weight is a force that results from the action of gravity on matter: it measures how strongly the force of gravity pulls on that matter. However, in most practical everyday situations the word "weight" is used when, strictly, "mass" is meant. For example, most people would say that an object "weighs one kilogram", even though the kilogram is a unit of mass.
The distinction between mass and weight is unimportant for many practical purposes because the strength of gravity does not vary too much on the surface of the Earth. In a uniform gravitational field, the gravitational force exerted on an object (its weight) is directly proportional to its mass. For example, object A weighs 10 times as much as object B, so therefore the mass of object A is 10 times greater than that of object B. This means that an object's mass can be measured indirectly by its weight, and so, for everyday purposes, weighing (using a weighing scale) is an entirely acceptable way of measuring mass. Similarly, a balance measures mass indirectly by comparing the weight of the measured item to that of an object(s) of known mass. Since the measured item and the comparison mass are in virtually the same location, so experiencing the same gravitational field, the effect of varying gravity does not affect the comparison or the resulting measurement.
The Earth's gravitational field is not uniform but can vary by as much as 0.5% at different locations on Earth (see Earth's gravity). These variations alter the relationship between weight and mass, and must be taken into account in high precision weight measurements that are intended to indirectly measure mass. Spring scales, which measure local weight, must be calibrated at the location at which the objects will be used to show this standard weight, to be legal for commerce.[來源請求]
This table shows the variation of acceleration due to gravity (and hence the variation of weight) at various locations on the Earth's surface.
The historic use of "weight" for "mass" also persists in some scientific terminology – for example, the chemical terms "atomic weight", "molecular weight", and "formula weight", can still be found rather than the preferred "atomic mass" etc.
In a different gravitational field, for example, on the surface of the Moon, an object can have a significantly different weight than on Earth. The gravity on the surface of the Moon is only about one-sixth as strong as on the surface of the Earth. A one-kilogram mass is still a one-kilogram mass (as mass is an extrinsic property of the object) but the downward force due to gravity, and therefore its weight, is only one-sixth of what the object would have on Earth. So a man of mass 180 pounds weighs only about 30 pounds-force when visiting the Moon.
In most modern scientific work, physical quantities are measured in SI units. The SI unit of weight is the same as that of force: the newton (N) – a derived unit which can also be expressed in SI base units as kg·m/s2 (kilograms times meters per second squared).
In commercial and everyday use, the term "weight" is usually used to mean mass, and the verb "to weigh" means "to determine the mass of" or "to have a mass of". Used in this sense, the proper SI unit is the kilogram (kg).
In United States customary units, the pound can be either a unit of force or a unit of mass. Related units used in some distinct, separate subsystems of units include the poundal and the slug. The poundal is defined as the force necessary to accelerate an object of one-pound mass at 1 ft/s2, and is equivalent to about 1/32.2 of a pound-force. The slug is defined as the amount of mass that accelerates at 1 ft/s2 when one pound-force is exerted on it, and is equivalent to about 32.2 pounds (mass).
The kilogram-force is a non-SI unit of force, defined as the force exerted by a one kilogram mass in standard Earth gravity (equal to 9.80665 newtons exactly). The dyne is the cgs unit of force and is not a part of SI, while weights measured in the cgs unit of mass, the gram, remain a part of SI.
- 原文："the weights of the planets towards the sun must be as their quantities of matter"
- Richard C. Morrison. Weight and gravity - the need for consistent definitions. The Physics Teacher. 1999, 37: 51. Bibcode:1999PhTea..37...51M. doi:10.1119/1.880152.
- Igal Galili. Weight versus gravitational force: historical and educational perspectives. International Journal of Science Education. 2001, 23: 1073. Bibcode:2001IJSEd..23.1073G. doi:10.1080/09500690110038585.
- Gat, Uri. The weight of mass and the mess of weight. (編) Richard Alan Strehlow. Standardization of Technical Terminology: Principles and Practice – second volume. ASTM International. 1988: 45–48. ISBN 978-0-8031-1183-7.
- The National Standard of Canada, CAN/CSA-Z234.1-89 Canadian Metric Practice Guide, January 1989:
- 5.7.3 Considerable confusion exists in the use of the term "weight." In commercial and everyday use, the term "weight" nearly always means mass. In science and technology "weight" has primarily meant a force due to gravity. In scientific and technical work, the term "weight" should be replaced by the term "mass" or "force," depending on the application.
- 5.7.4 The use of the verb "to weigh" meaning "to determine the mass of," e.g., "I weighed this object and determined its mass to be 5 kg," is correct.
- Allen L. King. Weight and weightlessness. American Journal of Physics. 1963, 30: 387. Bibcode:1962AmJPh..30..387K. doi:10.1119/1.1942032.
- A. P. French. On weightlessness. American Journal of Physics. 1995, 63: 105–106. Bibcode:1995AmJPh..63..105F. doi:10.1119/1.17990.
- Galili, I.; Lehavi, Y. The importance of weightlessness and tides in teaching gravitation (PDF). American Journal of Physics. 2003, 71 (11): 1127–1135. Bibcode:2003AmJPh..71.1127G. doi:10.1119/1.1607336.
- Resolution of the 3rd meeting of the CGPM (1901). BIPM. （原始內容存檔於2018-01-17）.
- Chester, W. Mechanics. London: George Allen & Unwin. 1979: 83. ISBN 0-04-510059-4.
- Bell, F. Principles of mechanics and biomechanics. Stanley Thornes Ltd. 1998: 174–176. ISBN 978-0-7487-3332-3.
- Galili, Igal. Weight and gravity: teachers』 ambiguity and students』 confusion about the concepts. International Journal of Science Education. 1993, 15 (2): 149–162. Bibcode:1993IJSEd..15..149G. doi:10.1080/0950069930150204.
- A. Thompson & B. N. Taylor. The NIST Guide for the use of the International System of Units, Section 8: Comments on Some Quantities and Their Units. Special Publication 811. NIST. 2010-03-03 [2009-07-02] [2010-05-22]. （原始內容存檔於2018-01-30）.
- Hodgeman, Charles (編). Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 44th. Cleveland, USA: Chemical Rubber Publishing Co. 1961: 3480–3485.
- Clark, John B. Physical and Mathematical Tables. Oliver and Boyd. 1964.
- Sur Das. Weighing Grain. Baburnama. 1590s. （原始內容存檔於2013-07-14）.
- Working Group 2 of the Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM/WG 2). International vocabulary of metrology — Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM) — Vocabulaire international de métrologie — Concepts fondamentaux et généraux et termes associés (VIM) (PDF) (JCGM 200:2008) 3rd. BIPM. 2008. Note 3 to Section 1.2. （原始內容存檔 (PDF)於2018-01-27） （English及French）.
- Barry N. Taylor; Ambler Thompson (編). The International System of Units (SI) (PDF). NIST Special Publication 330 2008. NIST. 2008: 52. （原始內容 (PDF)存檔於2017-06-22）.
- Halliday, David; Resnick, Robert; Walker, Jearl. Fundamentals of Physics 1 8th. Wiley. 2007: 95. ISBN 978-0-470-04473-5.
- ISO 80000-4:2006, Quantities and units - Part 4: Mechanics